WHAT OUR CIVILIZATION LACKS…

…is genuine love towards others whoever they may be, and I say whoever because if all 7.5+ billion on this earth had that required love, there would be no life of misery with suffering.

King Penguins
King Penguins

If we all as human beings would take the time just for a glance at the existence of other species, we would all learn the values of a truth that has never ever been properly taught, if taught at all.

No Racial Hate

Family Value

Penguins are totally content without bashing one another, as DeNiro says fuck Trump rather than plainly seeing just how pathetic human rule and human ways have always been when compared to other species.

Penguins trash, not the seashore, pollute no air, dump no waste or toxins in the ocean,  nor destroy the surface they all walk and live on. Penguins have no sexually transmitted diseases as the hundreds of millions throughout the human race. Penguins do not murder, steal, bully, rape, abuse children, nor trafficking of slaves for sex and labor. Penguins have no wars, no rebel violence, no torture, no genocide which kills millions, no corrupt elections, no corrupt religions, no corrupt charities, no taxes, and no corrupt money markets.

Penguins have no GMO foods that kill, nor drugs from the billion dollar pharmaceutical corporations which also kill through bad drugs, vaccines, and medications.

Penguins completely accept who they are, what they have, and how they live with togetherness, rather than the ways of humanity which have always killed, ruined, and destroyed.

Additional Information

https://ttimesoftrouble.wordpress.com/  information and many photos on many subjects such as slavery, human trafficking, twisted human rule, corrupt religions, the father of lies all believe, and much more always added to.

https://dochub.com/timesoftrouble  many writings on many subjects with many photos regarding this planet and our misled civilization.

https://dochub.com/timesoftrouble/VL6qe8/55_little_known_facts_about_human_trafficking

http://www.dreamcatchersforabusedchildren.com/

http://www.naturalnews.com/  – much research on bad foods, bad medication, and more.

http://vigilantcitizen.com/  – How Powerful This World of Darkness Truly Is

http://www.newworldordernews.com/  – Accurate news on our crumbling civilization.

http://www.blacklistednews.com/  – Continual reports which reveal just how deranged our human race has become.

https://dochub.com/timesoftrouble/3QEz8R/jeff-callarman – Resume

Contact

Jeffcallarman@ymail.com

timesoftroubles@gmail.com

 

 

 

Advertisements

HUMANS AND EARTH TODAY

To gain some understanding of reality, concerning the life of billions, means living an extremely restricted existence- thus making them no different in many ways by allowing a more clear view of others worldwide living in some of the worst possible conditions known to man while asking themselves– what if it was me in their situation of hunger, torture, sexual abuse, slavery, homeless, diseased, bodily deformed, being beheaded, or any of uncountable circumstances?

Digital CameraOur wedding in the Philippines 2009

us-with-ageHow we look 9 years later from our life with struggles.

If only people could just take eyes off themselves while seeing all the atrocities with human suffering that has always been worldwide, which will become worse than ever before on this globe– they could gain some of the big picture filled with gruesome ways that will eventually, sooner or later, come upon billions. But the sad truth is that we now live in the human screen generation which controls the mind of billions; and that control is no more than what their cell phone, computer, or television screen tells them– just as this world of selfie photos gives all their personal high or rush of pleasure: when in truth there is nothing more than the coming horrid darkness upon all humanity few can really see.

Want to know the corruption of individuals such as Bill and Hillary Clinton along with presidents before and after? How about politicians or big names in religion accompanied with uncountable others worldwide?  Just use names/thought through word search accompanied by corruption, lies, murder, bloodshed, sex, pedophiles, drugs, greed, power, wickedness and new world order? also killer ingredients in food, personal products, pharmaceuticals, and even our civilizations massive religious deception through “all” beliefs, and you will become flooded with information meant only for those with teachable opened minds– and the same holds true for any subject you may have a great interest in.

What does religion, belief, talk shows, politicians, any one person or group really do for the good of all mankind? What have any ever forsaken for the good of others?

So how does religion, beliefs, or trust in governments reflect on the way of civilization?

Unstable Marriages causing unstable families.

Rape

Pedophiles

Child abuse

Murder

Greed

STD (sexually transmitted disease)

Slavery

Human Trafficking

Prostitution (much through force as sex slaves from children to adults)

Diseases

Ocean Junkyard

Junkyard in Orbit

Air Pollution

Water Pollution

Soil Pollution

Drug Cartels

Drug Use

Alcoholics

Obesity

Same-Sex Relationships

Political Corruption and lies

Religious Corruption and lies

Financial Corruption and lies through Banks, Stock, etc.

Abortions/Murder

Famine/Drought

Over Crowed Prisons

One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest Insane Asylums

Totally Corrupted Legal System

Controlled Banks

Controlled Media

Controlled Television including the cartoons children watch

Controlled Education

Controlled Religions

Controlled Wars

Basically, Everything is Under Some Form of Control

Rebel Violence

Man-Made Disasters Worldwide

Wars soon will become the deadliest through biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons taking billions

Torture which has always been coming upon more and more people everywhere

Genocide That Has Murdered Near 300,000,000 Innocent Humans That Have Done No Wrong — And Your Time Is Coming To Join The Dead.

https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/RM1.RINGS.OF.TEARS.HTM

The actual facts on human corruption worldwide are so endless when everything is considered, that a million book library would be required in getting out truth on the way humanity has always pathetically ruled itself; therefore we as human beings have finally reached the beginning of our end under ignorant worthless human-rule via making way for the most destructive and life taking war which has never before been on this earth!

https://dochub.com/timesoftrouble – about 270 different writings on many subjects

http://www.deism.com/theageofreason.htm – These 146 pages is needed read for all that trust of what man has written in the Bible- rather than Truth from our Eternal Creator through Creation. Just how open is your mind? Who do you really trust? Self? After near 30 years of looking more closely at our world and the human race as it is and always has been, accompanied with in-depth private Bible studies, I no longer put any trust directly in myself or man- but rather the Power behind what has been created with an example using this extremely intricate design that cannot be matched in true life: or can your god of man with twisted and invented scripture do the same? Have you moved any mountains through faith lately? Been proving all things? rather than thousands of years being passed along as hearsay?

CRICKET

Want serious discussion on reality without argument?

cropped-100_4502

Through these past years of deep study, writing, prayer, and endurance through living as a have-not, I know not what is full absolute truth other than creation did not create itself; therefore let us learn from each other through depending on our Creator for what is true and what is false; never the thoughts of man without evidence.

https://ttimesoftrouble.wordpress.com/2016/07/10/effort-for-spiritual-knowledge/

No matter how hard we have wanted truth through much devotion — what have we really learned? Below is another link, which through evidence, changes the view of Jesus Christ billions have.

Please share

jeffcallarman@ymail.com or timesoftroubles@gmail.com

THERE IS A COMING DAY. . .

THERE IS A COMING DAY. . .

“When freedom will just be a essence of the mind, an inner dwelling that was once physically attainable. They will tell you where you can live, and what you can wear and drive, what and how much you can eat and drink, and how to purchase those. They will strip you of your religion, race, gender, national origin, age, color, creed, views and power, and have control of the population. They will set in a new world order, and put you in the back of the line, marked and branded. Everything before will be erased, and the new will be manipulated. And what you believe most, can only be kept secret, for all must fall in line of their govern. Anything outside will be abolished. Even death, will be sought, but restrained. They will execute complete and total control over everything, and be sole owners of your soul. The light, that once guided will go dim, and liberty will be like an unwilled bird, suppressed in the cage of your ribs; wings cut off.”

Quote  Anthony Liccione

Aside from what can be learned for any, being very few seeking truth and direction exactly as instructed by our Eternal Creator, not one earthly individual knows the absolute truth on their own coming destiny – [ESPECIALLY TODAY’S MISLED CHRISTIANITY] so says scripture not believed, known, or properly taught;

Yahweh looks down from heaven on Adam’s descendants
to see if there is anyone who acts wisely,
if there is anyone who seeks help from Elohim.
Everyone has turned away.
Together they have become rotten to the core.
No one, not even one person, does good things. Psalms 14:2-3 (NOG)                                                         

The following are 30 population control quotes which show that the elite truly believe that humans are a plague upon the earth and that a great culling is necessary…

  1. UK Television Presenter Sir David Attenborough: “We are a plague on the Earth. It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s not just climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde. Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now”
  2. Paul Ehrlich, a former science adviser to president George W. Bush and the author of “The Population Bomb”: “To our minds, the fundamental cure, reducing the scale of the human enterprise (including the size of the population) to keep its aggregate consumption within the carrying capacity of Earth is obvious but too much neglected or denied”
  3. Paul Ehrlich again, this time on the size of families: “Nobody, in my view, has the right to have 12 children or even three unless the second pregnancy is twins”
  4. Dave Foreman, the co-founder of Earth First: “We humans have become a disease, the Humanpox.”
  5. CNN Founder Ted Turner: “A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
  6. Japan’s Deputy Prime Minister Taro Asoabout medical patients with serious illnesses: “You cannot sleep well when you think it’s all paid by the government. This won’t be solved unless you let them hurry up and die.”
  7. David Rockefeller: “The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.”
  8. Environmental activist Roger Martin: “On a finite planet, the optimum population providing the best quality of life for all, is clearly much smaller than the maximum, permitting bare survival. The more we are, the less for each; fewer people mean better lives.”
  9. HBO personality Bill Maher: “I’m pro-choice, I’m for assisted suicide, I’m for regular suicide, I’m for whatever gets the freeway moving – that’s what I’m for. It’s too crowded, the planet is too crowded and we need to promote death.”
  10. MIT professor Penny Chisholm: “The real trick is, in terms of trying to level off at someplace lower than that 9 billion, is to get the birthrates in the developing countries to drop as fast as we can. And that will determine the level at which humans will level off on earth.”
  11. Julia Whitty, a columnist for Mother Jones: “The only known solution to ecological overshoot is to decelerate our population growth faster than it’s decelerating now and eventually reverse it—at the same time we slow and eventually reverse the rate at which we consume the planet’s resources. Success in these twin endeavors will crack our most pressing global issues: climate change, food scarcity, water supplies, immigration, health care, biodiversity loss, even war. On one front, we’ve already made unprecedented strides, reducing global fertility from an average 4.92 children per woman in 1950 to 2.56 today—an accomplishment of trial and sometimes brutally coercive error, but also a result of one woman at a time making her individual choices. The speed of this childbearing revolution, swimming hard against biological programming, rates as perhaps our greatest collective feat to date.”
  12. Colorado State University Professor Philip Cafaroin a paper entitled “Climate Ethics and Population Policy”: “Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for preventing catastrophic global climate change. Indeed, significantly reducing current human numbers may be necessary in order to do so.“
  13. Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka: “I do not bear any ill will toward people. However, I am convinced that the world, including all humanity, WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us.”
  14. Detroit News Columnist Nolan Finley: “Since the national attention is on birth control, here’s my idea: If we want to fight poverty, reduce violent crime and bring down our embarrassing drop-out rate, we should swap contraceptives for fluoride in Michigan’s drinking water.

We’ve got a baby problem in Michigan. Too many babies are born to immature parents who don’t have the skills to raise them, too many are delivered by poor women who can’t afford them, and too many are fathered by sorry layabouts who spread their seed like dandelions and then wander away from the consequences.”

  1. John Guillebaud, professor of family planning at University College London: “The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights. An extra child is the equivalent of a lot of flights across the planet.”
  2. Democrat strategist Steven Rattner: “WE need death panels. Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start allocating health care resources more prudently — rationing, by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.”
  3. Matthew Yglesias, a business and economics correspondent for Slate, in an article entitled “The Case for Death Panels, in One Chart”: “But not only is this health care spending on the elderly the key issue in the federal budget, our disproportionate allocation of health care dollars to old people surely accounts for the remarkable lack of apparent cost effectiveness of the American health care system. When the patient is already over 80, the simple fact of the matter is that no amount of treatment is going to work miracles in terms of life expectancy or quality of life.”
  4. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class”
  5. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
  6. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
  7. Salon columnist Mary Elizabeth Williamsin an article entitled “So What If Abortion Ends Life?”: “All life is not equal. That’s a difficult thing for liberals like me to talk about, lest we wind up looking like death-panel-loving, kill-your-grandma-and-your-precious-baby storm troopers. Yet a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it resides.”
  8. Alberto Giubilini of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia and Francesca Minerva of the University of Melbournein a paper published in the Journal of Medical Ethics: “[W]hen circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. … [W]e propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child.  Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.”
  9. Nina Fedoroff, a key adviser to Hillary Clinton: “We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people.”
  10. Barack Obama’s primary science adviser, John P. Holdren: “A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

  1. David Brower, the first Executive Director of the Sierra Club: “Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license … All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”
  2. Thomas Ferguson, former official in the U.S. State Department Office of Population Affairs: “There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…”
  3. Mikhail Gorbachev: “We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”
  4. Jacques Costeau: “In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”
  5. Finnish environmentalist Pentti Linkola: “If there were a button I could press, I would sacrifice myself without hesitating if it meant millions of people would die”
  6. Prince Phillip, husband of Queen Elizabeth II and co-founder of the World Wildlife Fund: “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”

Want better understanding of reality through the signs of the times with biblical foundation? Want what is not taught in churches worldwide? I have near 30 years of being a believer while keeping to myself – rather than being a part of any man made religion having their own doctrine and false teaching: therefore have become very teachable without clogged plumbing or short circuits in my brain while always;

Trust Yahweh with all your heart,
and do not rely on your own understanding.
In all your ways acknowledge him,
and he will make your paths smooth. [Or straight]  Proverbs 3:5-6 (NOG)

We can only learn through obedience to our creator accompanied with much time and dedication. In other words, becoming no longer of this world living in worldly ways.                                 

http://assemblyoftrueisrael.com/

http://www.christianidentityministries.com/kennedy.html

https://vigilantcitizen.com/ 

Who am I?

https://ttimesoftrouble.wordpress.com/

Through my entire life as a believer in our creator and the word, I have yet to find but one genuine doer, rather than hearers only deceiving themselves; thus am still waiting with prayer for Yah to place me with like minded believers, wherever they may be.

https://dochub.com/timesoftrouble 270 individual reads concerning our human race.

http://www.newworldordernews.com/

https://www.naturalnews.com/

http://blacklistednews.com/

Contact me timesoftroubles@gmail.com

INDIVIDUALISM

When there is but one man that has spent his life as a basic loner, was without question spared death on many different occasions, possesses about 27 years of private scripture studies, and has never been a church member or a part of any man-made religious organization — that person has become very teachable through placing zero trust in man-kind or themselves; therefore only looks to our Creator always to direct and make straight his path in this temporary human life. (Proverbs 3:6)
Through http://assemblyoftrueisrael.com/ – I have come to learn so much that has never been taught — therefore I need to be placed among other like minded believers while continuing my years and years of writing with studies — rather than a life as a have not without any purpose.
It was 17 years ago when I learned that human religious traditions such as holidays have proven pagan origin. What I also have learnt well through over a decade of experiences, is the fact being that the majority of believers, whether today’s so-called Christianity, Torah followers, or even those considering themselves true Israelite’s — have not followed scripture as instructed while showing no love for others backed with any deed when possible.
All sites will say contact us — but through the years all that I have contacted never reply, or will through totally ignoring just simple needs – which includes the site above.
What I have learnt most is the fact being that nobody can be told anything that they do not want to hear; and that includes the ways of this world filled with death, mislead, child abuse, human trafficking, genocide, wars, violence, government and religious corruption, pollution, and rebels bringing destruction in places worldwide while leaving millions of refugees homeless and without basic needs to even survive. Then added is all the natural and man-made disasters such as hurricanes, tornadoes, fires, and mass shootings as a way to bring gun control and weaken civilization.
Therefore, even though my wife and I have lived a difficult life with her parents living on the dirt in the shack behind the home — we are still very thankful for what we do have when being compared to refugees, homeless, and the millions suffering through different circumstances worldwide.
https://dochub.com/timesoftrouble – This link being one of the 16 free sites that I have put together through this past decade has about 270+ reads on world conditions, pagan origins of today’s Christianity, and some truth never taught in the religions of man.
https://ttimesoftrouble.wordpress.com/ – In this site is more of my current writings which cover worldly ways, and mislead.

For any really wanting what is different, in fact so different that most all will not believe, http://assemblyoftrueisrael.com/ shares a truth for only the few genuinely seeking; and that is because they can clearly see that the human ways of this world through rule, lies, and greed have no way to continue without bringing death upon billions.

What is best about unknown truth, is truth: therefore nothing is as billions have been led to believe.

“Teacher, which commandment is greatest in the law?” And he said to him, “‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’[a] This is the greatest and first commandment. And the second is like it: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’[b] On these two commandments depend all the law and the prophets.” (Matthew 22:36-40) (LEB)

“You[a] shall not seek vengeance, and you[b] shall not harbor a grudge against your[c] fellow citizens;[d] and you[e] shall love your[f] neighbor like yourself; [g] I am Yahweh.” (Leviticus 19:18) (LEB)

In this valuable addition, http://www.mega.nu/ampp/rummel/welcome.html shown in red photo, much sad reality regarding human rule can be learned for any willing to see things as they have always been, and are this day.

ARE YOU GENUINE? or TANGLED IN WORLDLY WAYS?

ARE YOU GENUINE? or TANGLED IN WORLDLY WAYS?

How many believers feel set apart from this world because they have chosen only the Hebrew teaching Yahshua taught rather than the doctrines and tradition of man?

How many have always been alone with no local brethren to enjoy the company of during the commanded Sabbaths and Feasts just as other Israelite’s scattered worldwide?

When we have a life of mostly living on prayer, we also have reached a point in our existence where all that we can do is. . .

In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths. (Proverbs 3:6) (KJV)

In all your ways submit to him, and he will make your paths straight. (NKJV)

Agree with Him in all your ways, and He will make your paths straight. (NLV)

Seek his will in all you do, and he will show you which path to take. (NLT)

In all thy ways think on him, and he shall (ad)dress thy goings. (In all thy ways, or in all thy deeds, think of him, and he shall direct thy steps.) (WYC)

These two links below, part 1 and 2 are easy for listening to a likable man on the meaning and believers involvement in the Feast of Tabernacles, and how today’s Christianity lives opposite of what has been instructed in scripture.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Om3dJG6W8rM&t=8s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJriCQPswtM

However, what is always most important for us all – [meaning those who actually follow the Book of Instruction from our Creator as doers rather than hearers only deceiving ourselves] – comes through knowing that we as genuine believers can place no full trust in man regardless of how good they appear to be; and that is because just a touch of strychnine can destroy all they have taught.                                                                            This site –  https://www.youtube.com/user/PastorMarvinEDavis/about – shares a little about the man in the links above; and just as all false teachers that I have experienced through my past 27 years as an individual searching for truth — [while never in my life being a church member or associated with any beliefs] — these following words accompanied with scripture all through the Bible are what is never taught. . .

“Everyone who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that every murderer does not have eternal life residing in him. We have come to know love by this: that he[a] laid down his life on behalf of us, and we ought to lay down our lives on behalf of the brothers. But whoever has the world’s material possessions and observes his brother in need[b] and shuts his heart against him, how does the love of God reside in him?

Little children, let us not love with word or with tongue, but in deed and truth. (1 John 3:15-18) (LEB)

What I have found through all ministries large and small is good salesmanship that leaves out the most important needed and required scripture in the entire Bible – and it is left silent because its a truth most all don’t want – therefore, if they were to teach this instruction, their own popularity and incoming funds [they wrongly call blessings] would vanish and be no more — thus making them as worldly and powered through pride with greed.

“Pride goeth before sorrow; and the spirit shall be enhanced before falling (and the spirit shall be raised up before a fall) (Proverbs 16:18) (WYC)

These links are but few of the 16 [free] websites I have been developing through this past decade while living as a have-not; thus, for any going through some of my writings compared to what has been most recent can see how much a true believer, being of the few in the narrow way, can have major changes in all that they have believed because they have learned never to look to man for truth or direction.

https://ttimesoftrouble.wordpress.com/about/  About who I am

My Efforts towards Spiritual Education seeking not from this world. These three links have the same base, but some slight differences in the way shared.

http://timesofroubles.webs.com/mywritingsforgod.htm

https://dochub.com/timesoftrouble/wjvzLJ/efforts-for-spiritual-knowledge

https://ttimesoftrouble.wordpress.com/2016/07/10/539/

The DocHub link below has very many interesting subjects on world conditions, false beliefs, corrupt governments, religions, and what is en route upon America and our entire human race – thus educational in many ways.

https://dochub.com/timesoftrouble

When a man of 62 years has belief, experience with today’s Christianity, 27 years since being spiritually drawn, and has never been the member of any Church, belief, or religiou$ organization – that individual becomes very teachable through a mind willing and wanting truth from not of this world — rather than being of the many in the wide worldly gate leading to destruction.

All that my wife and I can do in this life is pray while striving to live in ways which please our Creator – thus being in wait for a new life’s direction through doing His will anywhere on this globe. We have no children and no chains other than our lifetime debt of only about $4000 being for our transportation.

May our Creator direct your path.

 

If all US citizens went to war with their own government, and if the soldiers supported the government, who would win?

If all US citizens went to war with their own government, and if the soldiers supported the government, who would win?
I’ll answer this question with your scenario i.e the United States Armed Forces side with the United States government.

No doubt, the United States government would crush the uprising/revolution (I assume that the war originated from this cause).

Yes, I am aware that civilians as a whole in the United States possess a large stock of firearms. This is a great base to assume that they have a well-off chance against the government force.

However, civilians with their large arsenal of firearms can only pitch fairly against the military in a war of attrition.

With the huge number of manpower and firearms, they can easily overrun the military and push them back initially. On the other hand, when the military strikes back with force, they stand little chance to hold their grounds. For the sake of abbreviation, I will call the civilians as the USRF – “United States Revolutionary Force”.

  1. Open combat

The simple fact that the military possesses AFV (Armored Fighting Vehicles) i.e tanks, armored carriers, artillery, etc is enough to devastate any force of plain manpower on foot or automobile. As far as I know (correct me if I’m wrong), American civilians do not possess anti-tank weapons. So the armors will roll freely, gaining grounds along as they move.

Even if the USRF manages to pin down any group of military ground force, fire support will rain down from all available platforms. The United States Air Force, as known, has a gigantic arsenal of aircraft that can rain lead and explosive upon their enemies. The United States Navy as well, with also aircraft and cruise missiles. Having no effective means of air defence, will prove that the USRF stands no chance against incoming air bombardment. The much-beloved A-10 will the special “Angel of Death”, being freely as they like and loiter much as they want.

2. Urban warfare

Unless the government wants to keep cities intact, they can just level everything. If they do decide to go in directly to clear out everything, this is where the USRF can hold out efficiently. Imagine every building, occupied by the USRF forces with firepower at every corner. That is nightmare for any combat force, even with armor support. It will take months, or even years for them to successfully clear out a city of skyscrapers.

However, USRF’s Achilles’ heel is their available resource. Ammunition aren’t infinite. While the government can manage to produce more stock (somehow), the civilians will not have this luxury. Once their ammunition stock empties, there’s nothing else.

So all in all, even though a governmental victory is imminent, it will take years, or even decades to succeed, and will come to considerable losses.

Laura Hancock

If the soldiers support the government, the US citizens are getting massacred. There is no way in hell that a bunch of partially armed and generally-crappily-trained civilians are going to be able to take on the US military. The citizenry don’t have drones or planes or tanks or any of that crap. Some have guns.

Best case scenario, we end up with the citizens combining and essentially performing the equal of “terrorist attacks” on the government forces. But I’m not sure how well that would work. See, part of the reason why ISIS hasn’t been turned into a bloody smear at this point is the average US citizen doesn’t have much stomach for killing all of the innocent people who surround them. Yes, it does happen, but it’s not as if your average US citizen is desirous of bombing human shields. This, as well as pressure from other countries and governments, prevents the US military from unleashing max force.

In this scenario, where the government has turned against its people, who is going to be that intervening force? Nobody.

The pro-gun argument that somehow owning guns prevents the government from being tyrannical is, frankly, poppycock at best. Now, before the NRA jumps down my throat, I’m actually not anti-gun ownership, provided that all legal channels are adhered to, adequate training is had, they are stored and cared for properly, and you’re not walking around a Target like you’re goddamn Rambo trying to find the detergent aisle. (Which does happen to mean I’m against a lot of individual gun-ownership situations in the US, though.)

However, you’re not going to be able to take on the US government with a gun if it decides it wants to teach the populace what “tyrannical” means. Sorry.

617 Views · 2 Upvotes

The citizens, that is if the soldiers find it morally wrong to attack citizens of their own country, and decide that they won’t fight their own people.

The government, if the military decides to abide and follow the orders of the government. This is not as rare as an occurrence as once might think. There has been on numerous occasions where the U.S. military has attacked their own citizens. Mostly for reasons that are justifiable depending on the viewpoint.

The government has at times been able to crush numerous uprisings. But those times were long ago, and I can’t say exactly for sure if that would apply to today.

I would say citizens, because the questions states “all citizens”. That would include the U.S. military as all soldiers are citizens, and considering the only power the government would have is political at that point, they would ultimately lose—even the political power they had left would be quite small at that point.

267 Views · 2 Upvotes · Answer requested by John Smith

Matthew Beasley

Theoretically?

Well let us assume that the there really is this nice dividing line between the two. (And this NEVER happens) And let us assume that it really is ALL the civilian none government population of the US against the entire US military, instead of the far messier situation typically found in civil wars.

Well the initial victory goes to the US military. These guys are well trained professionals who will HAMMER a bunch of semi-trained civilians in a straight fight. Forget your little Hollywood fantasies of overthrowing your government overnight, not going to happen. Ever. You have NOTHING that can take on the formidable airborne, armoured and heavily armed forces of the US military on close to even terms. Bach Viet Nguyen is correct when he states that in open combat, a civilian uprising gets hammered. No ifs, no buts, YOU WILL LOSE. Badly I might add. You don’t even need to bring heavy weapons to the table. Professional soldiers have the necessary fire discipline, tactics and know-how to turn any head on confrontation against you with painfully sharp lesson as to why this is a bad idea.

If the US government is unable to cow the population into submission fast enough, then in the long run, the civilian population wins. Because while destroying this

is unlikely, it does have one major weakness. It needs supply lines. It needs logistical support. And THESE things ARE easier to destroy. (Although this will take time and hard earned experience) It also needs economics. Money to BUY the weapons. Money to BUY the fuel. Workers to RUN the essential industries that keep the US military running. A CIVILIAN population to recruit from. A CIVILIAN population to grow the food and educate the next generation of soldiers etc.

Also, forget the fantasies of people who think that their guns are all that stands between them and tyranny. I’d put money on them being killed off early on, even as an opening strike. These guys are happily posting their secrets away on Facebook and the like and easy prey. Frankly, I suspect that these guys would be just as likely to support tyranny than stand up to it.

Also, bear in mind that while some vocal individuals talk about how they would fight to the bitter end, I suspect that when push came to shove, their bravado would quietly fade away. Talk is cheap, but actions are expensive. (And VERY bloody in this scenario. It’s hard to support action when your friends and family are lying in a pool of their own blood. And lets not beat about the bush. A LOT of people are going to die for this.)

Ultimately, not only is it a highly unlikely scenario. Tyranny doesn’t just sneak up on you one day, it takes it’s sweet time. Uprisings are virtually never universally supported by the civilian population and opposed entirely by the military in the scenario you describe. And the US is a country with well built series of checks and balances. Freedom of speech allows the population air their grievances and the civilian government has options to allow redress for those that the state has done wrong. I don’t pretend that it’s perfect, but it works well enough for now. More importantly, it’s flaws are not enough to goad and mobilise the population of America.

So next time you hear someone talking about how an armed population keeps the government in check etc, then I think it is safe to assume that they haven’t a clue. If it gets to the point where your guns are the only thing between you and tyranny, then it’s all gone horribly pear-shaped LONG before then and what the hell were you doing while this happened?

399 Views · 4 Upvotes · Answer requested by John Smith

Q: If all US citizens went to war with their own government, who would win?

You see my friend, the entire goverment is manned and consisted of US citizens including this man.

President, Veep, the grunts etc is also US citizens so in essence the entire US population fights…. no one? Easy victory. Just start by punching and kicking the white house, oval room, senate chair and other goverment stuff, piece of cake eh?

3.5k Views · 39 Upvotes · Answer requested by John Smith

ALL the citizens?

In the long run the citizens win. Always. And it has absolutely nothing to do with weaponry. A completely unarmed citizenry still wins, so long as they remain united and dedicated to the cause.

It’s about logistics.

The army’s soldiers need to eat. Who runs the farms that produce that food? CITIZENS. Who drives the trucks that transport that food? CITIZENS. Who inspects that food to make sure it is safe to eat? CITIZENS. Who cooks that food? Processes that food? Preserves that food? CITIZENS.

Who manufactures spare parts for the army’s weapons? CITIZENS. Who assembles the equipment? CITIZENS. Who makes the ammo? CITIZENS.

Who refines the fuel for the army’s vehicles? CITIZENS. Who maintains the transport network that gets that fuel to the army? CITIZENS.

The soldiers in the army, do they have family and friends? Who are these people? CITIZENS.

If ALL the citizens went to war, then the first thing that happens is ALL citizens working in any capacity that supplies or supports the army stop working, or even engage in active sabotage.

The army has reserves of all critical supplies, but these will run out.

The army would then have to, from its own ranks of 2–3 million, do for itself all the support tasks that once were accomplished by civilian infrastructure run by 100–200 million citizens. They would not be able to trust anyone who was not a servicemember with these tasks, because all of those people are CITIZENS, and ALL the citizens are at war with them. Even their own families are CITIZENS, at war with them, and they would have to guard themselves from poisonings, kidnappings, or even simple spying.

No state, of whatever political system, can function if ALL its citizens were in open resurrection against it. Governments need to have compliance from the majority of the governed. Whether they get that by popular appeal, or from fear, or from any other method, they need it, and would not be able to function without it.

[Another totally blind answer using zeroed common sense towards the ways things in America and worldwide truly are]

293 Views · 2 Upvotes

J.S. Anderson

A few things: first, there are enough guns to arm everyone capable of bearing arms in the united states. Second, there are currently around 2.1 million active and reserve military personal. So, if all forces were pulled from everywhere else in the world, you could throw them up against nothing, because third, there would be no mass engagement of opposing forces. This is pretty obviously an insurgency. Guerrilla tactics are the order of the day. The US is a big country to get lost in, and hunting rifles are more than capable of acting in an anti-personnel role. Harassment, attrition… Basically everything that frustrates our current conflicts only instead of outnumbering the guerrillas, the the army is outnumbered by over 70 to 1. Fourth, funding. Specifically the large amount of it available to the insurgency. US citizens have a lot of assets among the ultra rich. Anything movable, or already overseas can be sold to fund the insurgency. Not sold for US dollars of course because this whole thing makes those worthless. Fifth, state defense forces. There are currently 21 of these, they are not a part of the military or armed forces of the United States. Some state SDFs even have their own air forces. Sixth, around 800 thousand sworn officers in the various police departments, a great many of whom will take issue with being asked to violate their oaths. Add Swat teams to this and you have more trained armed personnel for the resistance. (I couldn’t find reliable numbers for combined swat manpower, so I am unsure if they are part of the sworn officers or separate.)

In 2010 there were around 145 million citizens available for military service, (draftable, in other words) of which about 120 million were estimated to be fit. This number grows by about 4.4 million yearly.

There are easily enough arms for the ~144million civilians fit and able to bear arms.

I would posit that in such an event, the Government would realise that its position is untenable and capitulate to the (unfortunately violently) clearly expressed will of the people, an act which would be in keeping with the founding documents, and the philosophy behind them.

[My apologies for what I am sure is a host of grammatical errors, I’m on my phone]

[Timesoftroubles draws attention to the condition of America past and present as a civilization in the zoo of life as in caged, divided, and fed their sex, drugs, music, social sites, gambling, and all the bs they blindly swallow to keep them all weak and controlled for their coming take-over and fall].

194 Views · 1 Upvote

Ronald Kimmons

No government can remain in power if all of its civilians have unified against it in a concerted effort to depose it. This is true regardless of whether or not the citizens are armed. Citizens can overthrow their government by simply refusing to support it. Essentially, they can go on strike. At some point, the government has to give in, because it can no longer support itself. A heavy-handed government can fight this by killing people and using the threat of violence to make them do what it wants, but if the people are truly pushing forward in a united, concerted effort, even this will not work.

However, it is highly doubtful that the citizens would all be unified in an effort like this. Even if they were all opposing the government – which would be unlikely – they would probably be segmented into various groups and fighting among themselves as well.

[Ignorant answer when today’s military technology against a society in division being primitive in comparison becomes the reality]

341 Views · 1 Upvote

Ui Neil Sandidge

The government.

But who would win the government to any one point of view? Unity in a Government Position to make “War”, means human “corn starch” of the civilian demographic.

It happened in the 1920’s and other times people were made to march around homeless, yet history is like did that ever happen? Most of us are fine today? Less than civil wars, and founding cities before 1775 AD on Angel Island or Angel Bay California.

However.

There are more successful revolts than their are governments. So instead of “Win”, perhaps you have a different goal than shooting at each other? ~~~ An idea or new government model, or something that is an answer, and not a weapon, might win a hell of a lot easier than any coup, or protest in history. But it has to be very well defined. Leadership has to have a sense of lack of faith in its current models course direction = typically this means at least 20% of those in the streets outside of homes know the Government is bad and are in open revolt or at least contempt of it, or the battle becomes about weapons and “who feels most afraid” all over again.

Again, “who feels the most vulnerable or concerned by the idea of reprisal.”

Not many people have conviction enough to say within themselves, no matter what the fear is, this is definitely a better idea, that what the others want to do, and is what needs to happen if there is to be any sort of future for __?__

In my case the belief is human life on earth, With a human record we would want to learn from.

As our current failings, are entirely due to a lack of firstly truth, with secondly is a ridiculous failure of comprehension and accounting of the failings of any decisions made and note disclosed to the public, so total failure of value to discovered in having a leadership as their isn’t a leadership example to follow just a cloud of words,

the last time someone made the same bad decision and what it is costing us, then goes unknown to yet another generation of hey it have a new idea, “let’s just kill the 6 darkest of 12 tribes and spread the North Artic Race”, getting sunburn cancers in sandy soils and beaches every second of latitude closer toward the equator,

as all animal life in contact with the “North Artic system of values” immediately goes extinct if crushed stone is used.
Smooth Roads = Always brings Tail’ed by more Gun Owners for a Free Meal.

{in North Artic defense packed snow, inspired confidence in oblivion when compared to fresh powder grain snow. = Yet a powder surface for The True Twelve Tribes, of Foot Ballers who exercise on sandy beaches, just sort of boosts level of self confidence and strength in their abilities. causing enduring (ph)fisical improvement in them, rather than triggering, “i wish this was a packed surface” as North Artics instincts without a defined reason to them, lean toward pack pack pack it down.}

99 Views · Answer requested by John Smith

Sashank Reddy

The people of course. Thats a no brainer.

[Answer is a no-brainer]

20 Views · Answer requested by John Smith

John Tarin

Citizens……It would take great time and logistics to return men and machine to US soil. By that time the citizenry would have won. (tongue planted firmly in cheek)

[Timesoftrouble says — so much for BS and human education as head in the sand].

6 Views
 Related Questions
Below is additional writings/resources on world events including religious mislead
Many writings and photos on world conditions through human mislead and rule.
                                                                                                                                                              270 stories on the way things have been, and truly are this day.

Five things that just don’t add up about the Las Vegas mass shooting

Five things that just don’t add up about the Las Vegas mass shooting

What could be sadder than truth on reality?

Within our controlled society there is no full truth made known, but rather whatever information according to the plan of misleading lies fed into all minds through media. So why do these bloody horrors take place on the innocent? For the purpose of gaining gun control which will leave weapons of survival only for the American police state, military turned against their own countrymen . . .

Examples will include any country where there was a military coup, or where the military was ordered to put down an armed citizenry, or where the government used the military to use force to quash overt public resistance or dissent.

. . . and criminals that have always been able to get weapons illegally — whereas those law abiding either cannot acquire guns of choice, or have long waits and a difficult time; therefore, those with guns are but part of the controllers plan through killing as many necessary in different places all over America through many years past, unto this day, and will continue their murder spree on the innocent just to get as many weapons possible [through gun control confiscation] from all civilization to make people control easier for the new world order. For any with time and the want to know truth, do your own research on all the past shootings, corrupt governments, lying religions, banks, pharmaceutical corporations, GMO, vaccines, and an endless list having effect on all humanity  — and you will come to realize that nothing is as it appears to be.

#1) Dozens of concert-goers reported the presence of multiple shooters

Although law enforcement says there was only one shooter, multiple witnesses are openly reporting the presence of multiple shooters. This could reasonably be the result of confusion and chaos, but it’s also highly suspicious that the shooter had “full auto” weapon which is usually limited to law enforcement or military personnel.

This question about multiple shooters was also raised after the Aurora, Colorado “Batman movie theater” shooting, in which numerous witnesses reported the presence of multiple shooters.

If this shooting was carried out by multiple shooters, it would obviously indicate planning and coordination among a group of people who sought to carry out the shooting for a political purpose of some kind.

#2) Who warned concert-goers they were “all going to die” a full 45 minutes before the shooting started?

Via the UK Express:

One woman, who was at the Route 91 music event, claimed an unidentified woman had told other concert-goers they were “all going to die” after pushing her way to the front of the venue.

The witness, 21, told local news: “She had been messing with a lady in front of her and telling her she was going to die, that we were all going to die.

“They escorted her out to make her stop messing around with all the other people, but none of us knew it was going to be serious.”

She described the lady as Hispanic. The lady was escorted from the venue along with a man.

The unnamed witness, who was attending the event on her 21st birthday, described the pair as short, both around 5 ft 5ins to 5ft 6ins tall, and looked like “everyday people”.

It’s clear that neither of these two people were the shooter, as the shooter is a much taller Caucasian man. Thus, this is not a “lone gunman” massacre. There was coordination. At least three people were aware this shooting was about to take place.

#3) The weapon you hear on videos was FULL AUTO, which is almost impossible to acquire through legal means

The multitude of videos that captured the event clearly indicate that at least one shooter was running a full auto weapons system. Such weapons are almost impossible for “civilians” to acquire. Although some pre-1986 full auto weapons are available for sale, they require extensive ATF documentation, background checks and extremely long wait periods approaching one year. Plus, they tend to cost $25,000 or more, and they’re extremely rare.

Full auto weapons, however, are widely owned by police officers, federal officials and military organizations. It will be very interesting to find out where this weapon came from and how it was acquired.

#4) Why were the exits blocked, trapping victims like rats in a maze?

Numerous reports from witnesses who were on the scene reveal that nearly all the exits were blocked. One witness described the situation as “being caught like a rat in a maze” with numerous “dead ends.”

Why were nearly all the exits blocked? In essence, the concert created a kill zone that amplified the casualties. So far, according to the Clark County Sheriff in Vegas, 515 people have been injured and 59 people have so far died. These are unthinkable numbers, approaching war-time casualty counts. It’s clear from the coverage that this shockingly high body count would not have been possible if people had been free to flee the concert venue.

In essence, the concert trapped the people, preventing them from escaping, and denying them the ability to seek cover. From there, sustained, full-auto gunfire is almost impossible to survive.

In addition, once the shooting started, the stage lights were turned to the crowd, lighting up the crowd and making them an easier target for the shooter(s). Was this deliberate?

#5) Why did the shooter have as many as 10 firearms in his room?

According to news reports, the shooter — identified as Stephen Paddock — had as many as 10 firearms in his room, including several rifles. If he was the only shooter, what’s the point of having so many rifles? One man can obviously only shoot one rifle, and since he had a full auto rifle, he could obviously achieve his evil aims by focusing on his one rifle. There was no need for him to have multiple rifles.

So were the other rifles brought to the room to “stage” the crime scene with an abundance of guns? Why would one elderly man bother to carry 8 – 10 weapons to a hotel room in the first place? That’s a lot of work. Rifles aren’t lightweight devices.

I find the idea that a lone, elderly man would carry so many rifles to a hotel room for no practical reason to be highly suspicious. It makes no sense at all.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-10-02-five-things-that-just-dont-add-up-about-the-las-vegas-mass-shooting.html

Now concerning the sad truth, many have died, hundreds have suffered, and hundreds of millions have been made known of what happened — according to what media, police, and government want people to know — rather than truth.

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/las-vegas-gunman-active-after-mass-shooting-near-mandalay-bay-hotel-casino-1641489?

I am but a man that only watches thew signs of the times happening worldwide.

https://dochub.com/timesoftrouble – About 270 individual reads on world happenings in religion, government, and places worldwide.

https://ttimesoftrouble.wordpress.com/